FetchOpenClaws 回答更新日 Feb 25, 2026
How does managed OpenClaw hosting compare to self-hosted?
決定的な回答
FetchOpenClaws managed hosting eliminates server management, auto-scales on demand, includes built-in monitoring and backups, and deploys in under 60 seconds. Self-hosted gives you full control but requires significant DevOps investment, ongoing maintenance, and manual scaling.
カテゴリ: Deploymentシナリオ: A technical decision-maker evaluating whether to self-host OpenClaw on their own infrastructure or use FetchOpenClaws managed hosting.
ステップバイステップガイド
- 1List your requirements: uptime SLA, scaling needs, team size, and budget.
- 2Estimate the total cost of self-hosting: server costs, DevOps time, monitoring tools, and backup infrastructure.
- 3Compare with FetchOpenClaws pricing which bundles all these capabilities in one subscription.
- 4Evaluate the opportunity cost of DevOps time spent on infrastructure vs. building product features.
- 5Consider the scaling requirements: managed hosting auto-scales; self-hosted requires manual capacity planning.
- 6Make the decision based on total cost of ownership, not just server rental prices.
プロンプト例
Compare the total cost of running 5 OpenClaw agents on AWS ECS vs FetchOpenClaws managed hosting, including DevOps time, monitoring, backups, and SSL management.
よくある落とし穴
- Comparing only server costs without accounting for DevOps time and tool subscriptions
- Underestimating the maintenance burden of keeping containers, dependencies, and SSL certificates updated
- Assuming self-hosted is always cheaper when the hidden costs of downtime and incident response are significant
- Not considering team growth — managed hosting scales with your team without additional DevOps hires
よくある質問
ユーザーフィードバック
スタートアップ CTO
“回答ガイドが正しいデプロイ戦略の選択を助け、1時間以内にエージェントを稼働させました。”
DevOps エンジニア
“注意事項リストが本番障害を引き起こす設定ミスから救ってくれました。”
エージェンシーディレクター
“関連ツールリンクでこれらのページが実用的に — 一回のセッションで質問からデプロイまで。”